![]() |
| Manny Pacquiao and Timothy Bradley during the rematch of their controversial 2012 title fight, Saturday night in Las Vegas. (Courtesy: mp8.ph) |
I remember very clearly the night of
June 9th, 2012; well maybe not the exact date (I had to google that), but the
events that transpired in Las Vegas late that summer eve have stuck with me
nonetheless. I wasn't exactly expecting to witness sports history—the bad kind—,
but I sure got it anyways. It was, of course, the night that Manny Pacquiao was
screwed out of what should have been an easy unanimous-decision victory over
Timothy Bradley, ultimately finding himself on the wrong end of one the most
glaringly wrong split-decisions in history (115-113, 115-113, and 113-115).
Tim Bradley surely didn’t head down the
wrong corridor and stumble into the ring by mistake that night; he is, with
certainty, a world-class athlete (and had a undefeated record at the time to
back him up), and fully deserved his shot at the only eight-division world
champion in history. But all the worthiness in the world does not by default a
winner make; you still have to earn the right to stick around, most especially
with the world’s best. And speaking of world’s best, Pacquiao, for all the speculation
that he was beginning the descent from his career peak, still managed to
out-fight Bradley, in convincing fashion; I almost wasn’t paying attention as
the scores were read that night, it seemed so obvious that Pac was to be
declared winner. And then it was a close split-decision. And then Timothy
Bradley was the new WBO Welterweight Champion of the World. The boos started
almost immediately; after a brief dumbfounded silence, HBO’s Jim Lampley gave
the call about as well as anyone could: “Well, I tell you, I don’t think we’re
blind. I think Harold Lederman is the best scorer alive, and I think that is a
terrible, bogus decision” (Lederman had scored it 119-109 for Pacquiao). The
newly-crowed champ Bradley suggested he might go home and watch the fight on
tape to “see if I won the fight really or not,” which speaks volumes without
any further explanation.
For myself, I wanted to break something,
as bizarre as it sounds. It was as if in an instant, I had been stopped being
just a casual observer watching one of all-time greats spending another day at
the office and been transformed into something else; I was now, simply by
association (albeit a relatively detached one), invested into something much
larger than I had ever expected. Breaking furniture over a sporting event is
quite the stupid thing to do, so thankfully I did manage to stay calm and
restrain myself from that; the shock and the anger, however, stuck with.
“Something must be done!,” I remember
thinking to myself repeatedly, probably out loud more than once. I stayed glued
to the TV, wishing that the HBO telecast would continue on for hours into the
night, as if Lampley and the rest of the on-air crew’s continued dumbfounded analysis
of the night’s events would somehow change the result. And before long, they
did sign off, and all was chaos in the world of boxing. Over time, there were positive
developments, like the WBO announcing their own official review unanimously
ruled in favor of Pacquiao, and the decision by The Ring Magazine to not really count the fight in their official
rankings. But almost two years later, that result still stands, and with it
remains a wound to my soul.
At least I have some closure now. What
happened Saturday night in Vegas, when Pacquiao and Bradley met for the second
time, was more than just a big-deal rematch; it was something that needed to
happen, that should’ve have happened a long time ago. It was righting a wrong.
After his shocking knockout loss to Juan Manuel Márquez in their fourth bout,
and a relatively unremarkable victory over Brandon Rios in Macau, Manny’s
second performance against Bradley made even more clear that he is now surely
past his prime; as such, it was all the more satisfying to see him claim what
was rightfully his when he was finally awarded that unanimous decision
(116-112, 116-112, 118-110, this time) he earned all that time ago.
I can finally say that I’ve cleansed
myself of all contempt for Tim Bradley, and that I can even go back to liking
him as a competitor; having gone in there, given it his all, and taken a few
hard hands from the old champ, he’s earned his share of respect from me.
Despite his inability to knock over an all-time great, he still isn’t bad, and
he very likely has quite the future ahead of him.
For myself, the first Pacquiao-Bradley
encounter will long go down as the biggest sports robbery I’ve ever had the
chance to witness. But I can move on in my life from that now. Justice has
finally been served, and great wound to the sweet science has finally been
healed.
-Mitch
Carter is an Illinois State Scholar and an Associate Member of the Kendall
County Young Republicans.
carterscornerpr@gmail.com
Twitter @CartersCornerPR
No comments:
Post a Comment