Thursday, February 27, 2014

NHS Induction Remarks.

(I had the pleasure of giving the following brief remarks at the 2014 PHS National Honor Society induction ceremony. A transcript and video follows).

My fellow Americans, good evening,

I was asked whether crying is a sign of weakness or of strength; I decided, the frank thing is that crying is a sign of weakness, even if only in a narrowly interpreted sense. Crying is, essentially, a universal admission of human imperfection, a reminder that even we can be overpowered from time to time, without exception; perhaps, at times, it may be seen as a sign of strength, the strength the admit our own faults and weaknesses. To call upon the wise words of one Dan Tardi, “there’s no such thing as too much man to cry.”

To paraphrase a crew of lyricists and occasional would-be philosophers who named themselves for the old Revolutionary city from which they come*, some things are simply just a little more than a feeling; that is to say, some things are just too much for us to handle, they overpower us. Ron Swanson, the great American, once dispensed the sage wisdom that crying is only acceptable at “funerals and the Grand Canyon;” or, more broadly, at moments of great sadness and pain, or at sites of immaculate beauty.

For all of us, it’s a little something different, but we certainly all have something, whether we know it yet or not, that our emotions cannot express in words, rather only in sobbing and awkward face scrunching. For our mid-70s hair band friends, perhaps those things might be that young woman Marianne, who walked away, or that old song that they used to play, before it all slipped away.

Thank you very much, good night, good luck, and God bless the United States.

(video)
*(the "crew of lyricists" mentioned is, of course, Boston; the song is none other than "More Than A Feeling.")

Recommended Reading, February 27th, 2014.

"Armed men" take over Crimean parliament building, raise Russian flag (Reuters).

Yanukovych granted protection by Russia, flown to Moscow (FoxNews).

Governor Jan Brewer (R-AZ) vetoes controversial religious-freedom bill (AP).

MUST READ: Ben Shapiro from Breitbart crashes UCLA anti-Israel hearing, speaks out. (Breitbart).

Don't Get Too Excited: Speaker Boehner's favorability rating returns to pre-shutdown levels (Gallup).

Howard Kurtz on Paul & Cruz (FoxNews).

Meet "Japan's Tea Party" (WSJ/JapanRealTime).

Why China pushed down the yuan, short version (WSJ/MoneyBeat).


Sunday, February 23, 2014

What a Difference a Week Makes.

Protesters explore ousted President Viktor Yanukovych’s residence near Kiev.
(Courtesy: 
Sergey Dolzhenko/EPA; The Guardian).
Somehow it seems appropriate that in the twelve hours that I found myself all but entirely disconnected from headline news that the story of the week would break without me. As I had last heard of late Friday night, tensions in Ukraine were looking as though they might finally start to simmer down following the latest “truce” between the President and the various opposition leaders; then, when I finally checked in again last night, The Wall Street Journal homepage headed off with “Ukraine President Driven From Power.” Well that sure escalated quickly: months of unending protest were finally a proper revolution.

I’m by no means disappointed, just shocked that it took this long. For most of the past week, since the Euromaidan protest movement really started to capture major media attention, I had wondered where this was all going; of course I knew what the crowd wanted (the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych and closer ties with the EU), and that they weren’t exactly planning on going home without it, but as time went on I felt like they were dragging their feet when they could have gotten busy seizing the Presidential Palace earlier. Of course I’m not a man on the ground, so I only know so much.

I’m also a surprised by President Yanukovych himself. I have no interest in defending him, as the Russian puppet that he turned out to be, but I can’t help but wonder: why stay until the bloody end? There seems to me little logic in that; he had long since lost his authority by the time he signed on to the last truce with Vitali Klitschko and all the rest (with a Kremlin man in the room even!), and was at that point finally all but formally signing away his power. Now, I’m not Viktor Yanukovych, and I forever thank God for that, but if I were forced into an indefensible and ultimately hopeless situation by Putin, I’d like to that that I would have the good sense to flee the country before I lost the ability to do even that much.

This is, after all, Putin’s situation, whether he likes it or not; the Kremlin brought this upon itself when they pressured poor dumb Mr. Yanukovych into backing out of that trade deal with the EU, and know they ought to have to clean up after themselves. Alas, Mr. Yanukovych has sadly proven incapable of even this much forward thought, and he now suffers for it as Parliament has formally stripped him of his power, sending him (literally) running for the wilderness.

And speaking of Vlad, I can’t help but wonder how he’s feeling as this wild weekend finally draws to a close. Between Syria and Ed Snowden, 2013 was a banner year for Putin in reasserting Russia’s position in the geopolitical position (remember back in 2012 when it was cool for President Obama to shrug off Mitt Romney for daring to even suggest the possibility); 2014 has been a more lukewarm follow-up.

On one hand, the Sochi games managed to get past something of a rough start and become something of a spectacle, with Team Russia outperforming expectations to lead the final medal count with five more than the United States. On the other, in the words of the WSJ, this weekend also found “Russia Stung by Ally’s Defeat in Ukraine.

I assume he must be in an odd mood, at once celebrating both a successful and a failed showing of “new” Russian dominance. There is a unique upside in it for him: going forward, with a broken Ukraine now in the hands of anti-Russian opposition, all eyes now turn to the West for the situation to be stabilized; Putin’s Finance Minister has even gone as far as to suggest the IMF as the source for a badly needed bailout for the Ukrainians.

If the West succeeds in stabilizing the deeply divided nation, it surely would be of no benefit to Putin. But such thing may prove easier said than done, and if they fail, it’s their burden. For now, Putin can wash his hands of the situation and watch from the shadows. Given the circumstances as a whole, he could do much worse.
-Mitch Carter is an Illinois State Scholar and an Associate Member of the Kendall County Young Republicans.
carterscornerpr@gmail.com

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Record Column: The Flap About Flappy Bird

Flappy Bird, from .GEARS Studios.
(Courtesy Product-Reviews.net)

It seemed to come from nowhere, but be everywhere around me. I knew nothing about it, barely understood the few vague details I could catch. And then, I hardly remember how it happened, but I ended up with it myself. On my phone, that is.

Flappy Bird. It’s called Flappy Bird. The hottest video game on Earth. Featured in Time, declared “a cultural phenomenon” by Forbes, proclaimed by CNET (in bold type) as “the embodiment of our descent into madness.” Those who know it, know it well. Those who don’t, well, those who don’t are the lucky ones. There are always those lucky few who remain immune to any proper affliction, and I argue that Flappy Bird should seem such an exact thing, rearing up all around from nowhere to bowl us over as it did.

To me, it might just be the most successful media product in recent memory. I struggled with that last sentence; I almost wanted to say “media campaign,” but there was no commercial hype behind Flappy Bird; then I thought about using “media release,” but the game actually dropped in the App Store last May, so “release” didn’t quite seem appropriate, either. That really testifies to the magnitude of Flappy Bird’s success, too: that an odd, pointless game, from a mysterious one-man developer in Vietnam, would suddenly rise up from complete obscurity almost a year after its creation.

So many of the game’s general characteristics—mind-numbingly simple and absolutely free, yet unbelievably frustrating—are certainly anything but unique, and yet somehow it has unequivocally become the mobile phone world’s meme of the moment.

I can’t help but wonder what exactly so fascinates people about this game that they would start to download it in droves. Calling it simple really doesn’t do any justice: you try to fly a little pixelated bird through pipes. Tap the screen keep the bird afloat. Touch the pipes, or the ground, and, the bird drops dead. Game over. That’s all there is to it. No end goal; no storyline. No power-ups, or upgrades, or un-lockable content. Just a cheaply-rendered bird and some green pipes that seem stolen from an old Mario game.

And that’s not even the strangest part: people have spent hours of their lives playing this game, mostly spent in crippling frustration, endless vain attempts at surpassing a high score. And for many, the bar isn’t even set that high: the internet-average score seems to be around seven; a friend and colleague of mine here at the paper (name withheld to spare undue embarrassment) admits having never managed to pass more than three pipes. Getting into the mid-teens is widely viewed as a respectable accomplishment, and the thirties as an impressive feat of skill.

Of course, there are always exceptions to such mundane talent. Over lunch last week, a friend told me of how he attained a score of 192. “Sometimes I feel like I’m only good at useless things,” he starts telling me, when I wheeled around in my seat. I heard it, again; the ringing noise the game makes when the bird makes it through a pipe. A horrifying sound, it emanates from all around, piercing through the usual buzz of conversation as if for the sole purpose of my own misery. I’ve heard it out to eat with friends after 10:00. I’ve heard it on trains back from Chicago (“What’s your highest score, anyways?” one person behind me asks a friend. “Six.” “Four,” says a third. Another chimes in, “I got past thirty, once.” “It’s weird, it’s just so addicting.”). I can’t begin to comprehend how they can put up with it right in front of them; it’s not like the game makes any important sounds.

I know that if I had left my sound on all this time, that ringing would have all but driven me insane; that’s how much time I’ve invested into this enterprise. I remember a game that came out a few years ago called Skyrim, an open-ended dragon-slaying fantast sort of thing, and there were people who spent days in solitude playing it; it became a near-substitute for reality to them. To Skyrim superior software to Flappy Bird is a wild understatement, yet it never really did much for me; I think I’ve played less of it in two years than I have played Flappy Bird in a matter of two weeks.

I can at least say with some confidence that I have gained something for my time and trouble; after humble beginnings that saw great struggle to even pass five, I can report that I not only progressed through the teens and twenties and into the thirties, but that I honed my skills and gradually worked my way to current peak of eighty-six, an anecdotal ranking that somehow at once is both a sign of too much time wasted as well as a figure that commands some odd measure of prestige.

And I realized something along the way, knowledge that came to me as I began to recognize the fundamentals that allowed for advancement through some of the farthest reaches of pipework. Other, more complex games may serve as a virtual reality, a sort alternative to real life.

Flappy Bird, on the other hand, is something entirely different: it is a rough metaphor for life, or so it seems to me. Some of us go farther than others, some of us fizzle out. Some of us get stuck in ruts, others keep going on into uncharted territory. Success requires both luck to encounter favorable terrain, and the skill to traverse it. Timing will often be everything, though sometimes we won’t be able to help but get caught up and clip the side of a pipe, just as we find ourselves on the cusp of greatness. Inevitably, fate will catch up to us and we will finally drop; when we do, it will be what we’ve left behind that survives us.

And so many of us will keep on at it, with this game, in search of something and finding almost nothing; sure, we’ll name numerical goals for some score that we want to beat, and we might get there eventually. And then someday, when the passage of time finally washes Flappy Bird away, we’ll look back in wonder and amazement at the journey we’ve just taken towards a useless final score.

Ironically, those of us who were fooled by the cheap and minimalist design into taking Flappy Bird for less than it is are not the only ones who have been driven mad. Dong Nguyen, the mysterious creator and the mind behind the one-man .GEARS Studios announced last weekend via Twitter that “I cannot take this anymore,” and promptly removed the game from the App Store and Google Play, apparently tired of the intense media attention surrounding the rapid rise of Flappy Bird. As of now, he’s believed to be making $50,000 a day in ad revenue.

However, if Mr. Nguyen wanted to kill off his Frankenstein’s Monster immediately, and be done with it, I fear he may have acted just a bit too late. If anything, he’s bound to receive even more curious tweets, with the world now wondering about the future of his software. That is, of course, if those who would ask can find the time to quit tapping to flap and switch apps. Quarantine is little help for the infected; for those of us who had already downloaded long before, the app still opens and functions normally, and life goes on.  

During one session of flights, I happened to notice that the ad up at the top of the screen was one of those “meet hot singles in your area” things; a line of smaller-than-thumbnail images of women beamed at me, with “Meet Me,” “Meet Me,” “Meet Me,” “Meet Me” written under all of them. I couldn’t help but laugh, and smirk at them. “Can’t you tell,” I think to myself, as though I can communicate with these pictures through some sort of telekinesis powers, “that I’m too busy flying through pipes right now to be bothered with meeting any of you?”

I push the little green play button to start over again; this time it seems I’ll be a blue bird fluttering through a night sky…until I clip a pipe and drop to the floor, only to repeat the process again, and then again. Red birds, yellow birds; day and night; over and over. More frustrated tweets are to come, I’m sure. I don’t doubt I’ll be hearing that torturous ding for some time. I’ll top my own score now and again a few more times, only to find someone still five times better, before this all might possibly fade away. That’s life, really; “Some will win, some will lose/Some were born to sing the blues/Oh, the movie never ends/It goes on and on and on and on…”
-Mitch Carter is an Illinois State Scholar and an Associate Member of the Kendall County Young Republicans.
@CartersCornerPR

Recommended Reading: February 19th/20th, 2014.

Well that didn't last long: Ukrainians call another truce, then return to fighting (Washington Post)...

...Putin sends representative to to "mediate" talks (President of Russia/Kremlin.ru).

Minimum-wage hike would kill jobs (ABC).

Biden suspects Obamacare enrollment may not reach quota (Newsmax).

"House of Cards" airs unedited in China (New York Times/Sinosphere).

On the ground in the Michigan Senate race (Politico).

Pussy Riot turns Sochi attack into a music video (WSJ/Speakeasy).

Inside the Army treasure room (BuzzFeed).

Florida teacher charged with battery for making child clean a urinal (The Smoking Gun).

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Live from Kiev it's the Ukrainian Revolution!


Thanks to the magic of YouTube, we can all watch it live and free on the internet. Every once in a while they stop to sing hymns or listen to this badass rock 'n' roll band--all in Ukrainian of course--that's there for some reason (they really put Pussy Riot to shame, if you ask me). It really adds a nice eastern touch to the whole tired old "mauling riot police and burning tires" concept.

Keep your eyes peeled; I might tweet updates. Might.


Recommended Reading: February 18th, 2014.

New wave of protest violence in the Ukraine (Wall Street Journal).

House GOP shelves "big-ticket" legislation for the year (Washington Post).

President Obama wraps up long weekend of golfing (and a summit with the King of Jordan) (WSJ/Washington Wire).

Iran refuses to scrap nuclear facilities (Fox News)...

...Rouhani attacks Israel as "Zionist regime" (Jerusalem Post).

Darrell Issa is stumping in New Hampshire (National Journal).

Betsy Woodruff talks party strategy with RNC Chairman Reince Priebus (NRO).

Japanese stocks rise on news of steady central-banking policy (CNBC).

Lech Walesa lashes out at President Obama (Newsmax).

Ted Cruz marks the five-year anniversary of the stimulus package on twitter (@SenTedCruz).

Pussy Riot members detained is Sochi, released (New York Post).

Sunday, February 16, 2014

From Kiev to Cairo to Kabul: Three Tales of a World in Flux.

Ukrainian protesters leave Kiev city hall that they have occupied for two months.
( REUTERS/GLEB GARANICH)

I sometimes ponder whether the American political mind could ever handle true “chaos,” in the way that so much of the world understands it. We so often find middle-aged upper class men in suits bickering over talking points in front of TV cameras, as the clock ticks towards some “doomsday” deadline, as the height of instability. For all of last week, the entire chattering class and its followers were all but completely focused on the political theatre surrounding the latest showdown over the debt ceiling (we even wrote about it here): would Speaker Boehner successfully pitch a strategy that the House Republicans could rally around?; would Paul Ryan lead the majority of the conference to side against the leadership?; would Mitch McConnell come forward and vote to invoke cloture over a Ted Cruz filibuster?

The answers to the first two quickly became no and yes, respectively. With some reluctance, Senator McConnell did come forward and give a “yay” to end the threat of a default. Yay for him, crisis averted through parliamentary procedure; and there are those who would say we’ve never had it so bad.

The protests began almost immediately, organized by opposition leaders including heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitschko, and were largely peaceful until government forces began a quickly-escalating crackdown that ended largely in failure by the middle of December, when riot police were forced withdraw after being beaten back at the protest line. Aside from the occasional extreme beatings, and of course the deadly shootings that began in January, the lines haven’t shifted back very much.

The situation is precarious; President Yanukovich was forced to back down from a contested presidential election once before a decade ago. Now, entrenched in power, it seems unlikely that he would simply give in second time. For themselves, the Ukrainian people at-large are fighting to make the fateful decision whether their country, geographically situated as it is, will be held under the thumb of Putin’s increasingly neo-statist Russia, or if it shall tie its fate to the more open and democratic ways of the EU (Nigel Farage may dispute that point slightly).

For now, as the new amnesty goes into effect and Yanukovich prepares to offer Klitschko and the crowd new concessions, we wait.


*                    *                    *


Meanwhile, in Egypt, the new regime is making moves towards the direction that I for one will go out on a limb and call progress, though I remain infinitely disappointed in this White House’s utter failure to provide the regime with some productive direction. To call this a “new Egypt” really would be something of a fallacy; the current government isn’t really distinct from old Naguib/Nasser/Sadat/Mubarak Egypt as it is a new spin on it after a brief interruption.

At the head of the new government is the man behind the non-coup coup, Field Marshal Abdel Fattah el-Sisi; though surely not perfect, he embodies the idea of (to steal a line from Thatcher) the “man we can do business with.” His ouster of bumbling Islamist President Mohamed Morsi early last July was a welcome exception to the sad rule of the “Arab Spring” of late (somewhat humorously evoking in my mind master Yoda’s “At an end your rule is, and not short enough it was” line).

Sisi has since severely cracked down on the Muslim Brotherhood, which I was glad to see declared an illegal terrorist organization on Christmas day, and other militant groups. He has taken his crusade not only into the Sinai peninsula, but even as far as Gaza, launching operations against Hamas in his ruthless campaign against radical elements.

This fierce opposition to enemies of both American interests and our Israeli allies should easily make Sisi something of a friend to us—and he is just as disappointed as I that the Obama administration has not played a strong hand in backing the new regime, going as far as accusing the White House as having “turned [their] back on the Egyptians.”



With obvious room for improvement shown by a regime that is most certainly a bit rough around the edges, it would unequivocally be in the best interest of the United States government to cultivate strong and productive relations with the Egyptian government before it is too late; Sisi's preparing a run for President, with large public support, and President Putin is already backing his yet-undeclared run. For the United States to allow Russia the opportunity to become a major guiding force in Sisi’s campaign against extremism is too big a risk to justify making.


*                    *                    *


If Egypt is moving somewhat in the right direction in the absence of a coherent American strategy in the Mid-East, Afghanistan is moving in the exact opposite direction. The past few years have been nothing but a sad and steady downward slide in relations between the United States and our supposed allies in Kabul.

I am proud to have supported the mission in Afghanistan until the bloody end, but I cannot proclaim that there is much more room for American involvement without delving into complete pointlessness. President Karzai, once a capable partner during the Bush years, has evolved into something of a foe; members of the Afghan security force, once presented as the pride of the nation’s future, now regularly turn their guns on the American soldiers who trained them.



It now seems likely that we will have to wait until after the election of Karzai’s successor this April to move forward with talks. Possibly the most unfortunate side to this is that, in all fairness, there is no clear alternative path for the White House to follow from here.

The larger lesson in all of this should be clear: the United States stands at a precarious point, lacking a clear international directive, and quickly losing control and influence over a region that has spent the past half-decade riding repeated fierce waves of instability, while a resurgent Russia asserts its own growing influence over the geopolitical sphere. If we do not quickly bring an end to this directionless movement, we cannot have much of a right to complain when world our influence over world events continues to erode, and will have little say in the glove shaped by rising new superpowers.
-Mitch Carter is an Illinois State Scholar and an Associate Member of the Kendall County Young Republicans.

Twitter @CartersCornerPR

Recommended Reading: February 15th/16th, 2014.

Highlights from Esquire's profile of Toronto Mayor Rob "I've got more than enough to eat" Ford (The Blaze).

Tennessee Volkswagen workers vote against UAW representation (Newsmax).

Senator McConnell justifies his vote for cloture on the debt-ceiling (Politico).

Treasurer Rutherford gives a 50% pay-hike to assistant he "repeatedly" roomed with (Chicago Tribune).

Syria talks end in deadlock (Washington Post).

Ukrainian protesters end occupation of Kiev city hall (Wall Street Journal).

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro (United Socialist Party) orders manhunt for opposition leader amid violent protest (Miami Herald).

On Putin and his political aims in Sochi (Wall Street Journal).

US hockey team beats Russia (New York Post).

The largest Bitcoin exchange, Mt. Gox, is falling apart (Washington Post).

Love-letters from President Nixon (Breitbart).

63% of Americans consider Valentine's Day "among the least important holidays" (margin of error is +/-3%) (Rasmussen Reports).

Netflix trolls members of Congress with House of Cards tweets (BuzzFeed).

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Friday Fun-Time: FlapMMO.

FlapMMO, an online replication of the now-infamous "Flappy Bird."


If you haven't heard of Flappy Bird, the awful and addicting tap-to-fly-the-little-bird-through-pipes mobile game that flared up to become the most downloaded game on Earth until its mysterious Vietnamese creator yanked it from the various app stores, you might be living under a rock. But for those who have arrived late to the party and would like to offer up their own sanity, or for seasoned players who seek a new spin on the old form, the internet has again worked its magic to come up with the marvelous burst of insanity that is 'FlapMMO.'

Aside from translating Flappy Bird to a larger and wider screen, the game seems graphically identical (and very sharp looking, might I add). The touch screen tapping mechanism has been replaced with tapping of the space bar; naturally, this is the one and only control. I would argue that this new web version is somehow more difficult than the original mobile game, as I've yet to mange a score higher than 8 (my "real" Flappy Bird score is 86); of course, there are those who can barely get past 5 pipes in any version, so calling any one more difficult than the other is about the same as parsing the meaning of the word "is."

The game gets the second half of its title from the video game phrase "massively multiplayer online game," or "MMO," a category of game where large groups of players take part at once. FlapMMO is exactly this; there seem to be at least thirty-ish servers, each capable of handling upwards of 500 players. This adds an interesting layer to the experience: as you begin your run-through, it appears as though your red bird is surrounded by hundreds of translucent yellow birds following the same path, a countless number of whom fall at once as they collide with the first few pipes. As you progress into the further pipes, the crowd of other players becomes smaller and more spread out.

Though there is no true interaction, FlapMMO does allow for you to give your bird a screen name, inevitably leading to...interesting results. Some are seem to be rather unremarkable, others are keyboard pictures. And then, of course, there are entries ranging from "Hitler was right" to "BrackPoop" to "JESUS" to "YOLO" to to "chixen nuggets," and my personal favorites, "Richard M. Nixon" and "karl rove" (there are also several other notable names that happen to be of the sort that I won't be publishing).

Click here to play.

UPDATE: It seems that some servers present the game in different templates, including a fish version.
Also, new favorite names: "hide yo kids" and "Sir Swaggington."


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

On the Debt Ceiling: Back From the Line

I don’t agree with President Obama on much. Okay, maybe that’s an understatement. But that’s not to say that I’ve never agreed with him on anything, which I have; there was that time in 2006 when then-Senator Obama declared that "America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit." Since he’s been the President he’s apparently changed his mind, as he now demands automatic increases with no strings attached.

Which brings us to the latest showdown, or lack thereof. In way that I cannot explain, it almost seems as if a semi-orderly Republican surrender on the debt-limit issue is just as politically dramatic as a to-the-wire showdown on the issue. As of tonight, a “clean” increase in the debt-limit is through the House and Senate, and on its way to the President’s desk, where upon signing the Treasury’s borrowing authority will be extending until roughly March of 2015; as some have been quick to point out, this is the first time that the House GOP has all but given up the issue without any real fight for concessions.

The blame falls, not very surprisingly, with Speaker Boehner. There are certainly times that I don’t begrudge him his job, and this is one of them. The debt-ceiling is a complex issue. Is it a concession of failure to address a growing debt problem that we have to so frequently raise it? Without question. But is it so worthwhile to push the issue that the rewards match the risks of coming down to the line on a default? Not in my book. Especially not anymore.

With all of their leverage in 2011, the best that the House Conference could pull out of strenuous negotiations with the President and the Senate Democratic leadership was the Budget Control Act; you know things aren’t going well when the now-eviscerated source of my favorite 2013 word, “sequester,” is a relative beacon of fiscal responsibility. Since then, Republican extractions from these showdowns have become smaller and more spaced out, simultaneously as the Congressional Republicans have become more divided.

After three years on the job, I don’t think that forming a unifying strategy should be too much to ask of Speaker Boehner; yet once again, he fails to move things along without Democratic votes. I don’t blame every instance of such an occurrence on him, but in this case he shoulders an overwhelming share of the blame. As recently as Monday night, I had understood that the House Conference had developed something of a strategy: tie restoration of military benefit cuts from the Ryan-Murray compromise to an increase in the debt limit. I also understand that, as with several prior attempted pitches, the “rank-and-file” refused on the grounds that any increase was unacceptable.

To call this initial rejection a failure on the Speaker’s part would be unfair, but his complete inability to press the matter was. The strategy wasn’t far-fetched: if it worked, controversial benefit reductions were undone; if it didn’t, then the Democrats had that on their record (after voting on the debt-ceiling proposal, the House and Senate both overwhelmingly passed the military pension measure, this time without any pressure on the Democrats to “give the Republicans what they want”).

The big story out of the Senate today is that Minority Leader McConnell led the charge to invoke cloture on Senator Cruz’s filibuster against raising the debt-ceiling; naturally, Tea Party groups are angered, most notably McConnell’s primary challenger Matt Bevin. But I have to defend McConnell here: it’s not like he did it because he wanted to, or because it’s politically convenient for him; he did it because there was no other choice. The bill that arrived on the Senate floor was in its basest form, lacking in House GOP entanglements. If the Senate failed to pass the measure, there was no other way to avoid ramming the ceiling; the House already put on full display last night that they have nothing  productive  left to offer this go-round.


If that’s not a failure of leadership, I don’t know what is.

Recommended Reading: February 12th, 2014.

Speaker Boehner leads 28 members of the House GOP to vote for  "clean" debt-ceiling increase (Washington Post)...

...Chairman Ryan leads the rest of the Conference against the measure (WSJ/WashingtonWire)...

...Democrats John Barrow of Georgia and Jim Matheson of Utah cross the line (WSJ/WashingtonWire).

With the Dow trading down at mid-day, rumors of a resumed selloff surface (WSJ/MoneyBeat).

Rand Paul and Ken Cuccinelli on their lawsuit against the NSA (Politico).

Republican City Councilman Kevin Faulconer decisively becomes Mayor of San Diego, now the largest city with a Republican mayor (U-T San Diego).

Iranian General: "Ready for decisive battle" with the US and Israel (Washington Times).

Jim Geraghty's 2014 Attorney General races to watch (National Review).

Jonah Goldberg on 2016 (National Review).

Slideshow: It's 60 degrees in Sochi (WSJ).

Monday, February 10, 2014

Which Putin Are You?

According to BuzzFeed, I'm "Warrior Putin."
Which Putin are you?

An Era Unto Himself

-Now-former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke leaves work for the last time on January 31st. (Courtesy Federal Reserve).
When Ben Bernanke’s last day on the job as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board saw a 149.76-point slide in the Dow Jones index that he pumped (or should I say printed?) up repeatedly to many a successive record close, I had a hard time deciding whether I should pity him, or in some way be humored by the occurrence. It struck me almost as if the Big Board was replaying in six-and-a-half hours the roller coaster ride that was the eight years of Bernanke’s term: a Dow that, despite its occasional troubles, had triumphantly marched through years of sluggish growth to sit higher at the end of his term than it did at the height of the housing bubble, around his start; all this being atop a jittery overall-economy that, while not free-falling, couldn’t quite stand strong on its own legs, either.

There’s not a whole lot for me to say about the man that hasn’t already been said by people with a much higher knowledge of economics and finance than I do; but I have had occasion to analyze him from a more political perspective, and considering that hindsight is usually twenty-twenty, now would naturally be a great time to pause and reflect on the tenure of who may be nearly the most powerful of the most powerful financial officers to ever exist (can anyone really argue that the Treasury Department, especially under President Obama, wields anywhere close to the amount of raw power that the Fed does, or that it could use it so efficiently?).

I have no qualms in being straightforward about my criticisms of his policy, and I may yet be vindicated in my beliefs just as likely as I am to not be; after all, Quantitative Easing (the dastardly “QE3”) is just now beginning to end, as we enter the brave new world of the Yellen Fed (which started its own new day in central banking with a 300-plus crash in the Dow).

I have no regrets for passing along, if not silently endorsing, the theory that Chairman Bernanke was “destroying the economy” by way of the printing press; in the best case, it seems that, even if not in any way negative to our economy, quantitative easing did nothing to boost our prospects, either. We simply just hummed along at an anemic rate of growth, almost as if the years of solid gains on Wall Street were nothing more than the result of, well, artificial stimulus.

I know that I’ve at times incessantly mocked the ex-Chairman, first picking up the “Helicopter Ben” line (in reference to his long-ago speech on deflation and the theoretical “helicopter drop” of money); at times, I’ve gone as far as to use the phrase “Chairman Ben and his Politburo” (a thinly-veiled reference to Mao) to express my dislike for his policy decisions.

But I do have some nice things to say. I’ve always had a deep respect for Bernanke for his being the most powerful bearded man in the world; with his retirement, I fear we may have, for the time being, seen the last major power-player with prominent facial hair step off of the world stage.

And on a more serious level, I will always respect Ben Bernanke as the man who stopped the Great Recession dead, instrumental in the ending of a devastating free-fall. Especially after the departure of Bush and Paulson, Time was more than justified in honoring Bernanke as the 2009 Man of the Year for his work—even if it did begin to set the Fed down an uncertain and uncharted course.

Only time will reveal his full legacy, but regardless of how things turn out, one thing is already certain: an era has come to an end.